The project was part of the 2019 Design for America's national project on facilitating plastic film recycling at the local community–San Marcos (SM), Texas. 
Role: Project lead
Project timeline: 3 months
Design Process: Identity, Immerse, Reframe, Ideate, Build, Test
Community partners: FFRG, Texas State Campus Recycling Center, RAs (Residential Assistant)
IDENTITY 
Objective: identify the potential challenge areas in San Marcos. We reached out to the main grocery store in SM—HEB that offer plastic drop-off station, the campus recycling center, and resident assistant to better understand how they currently utilize the recycling system. We also interviewed 3 families and 7 students who live in SM. 
Key Takeaway1. Although there are plastic film recycling drop-off locations in San Marcos, they have not been utilized with full potential. The majority of community members don’t know what plastic film is and if they can be recycled.
2. Plastic film recycling isn’t accessible for Texas State students (50% of the San Marcos population). Informing students on how to recycle plastic film would make a considerable change in the community.
Design needs to adapt before it can create organizational change.
Organizational change is measured by
     1. Structural Change: plastic film collection infrastructure
     2. Changes in the Nature of Work: how the local community utilizes recycling program
At the end of Identify, we narrow the challenge into 3 main areas by rewriting the How Can We (HCW) questions
     1. HCW provides community members at the grocery store plastic film recycling information so that they can consume less plastic package and drop off their plastic film after uses?
     2. HCW give students on campus a creative incentive system so that they feel excited to eliminate plastic film on campus?
     3. HCW organizes a pilot program for RA’s and students in the dorms so that they have a better understanding of plastic film recycling and how to do it?

:: Stakeholder Map ::

IMMERSE 
Objective: conduct secondary research with end users to better understand the root causes of the challenge
Method: interview (Texas Disposal System, Campus Recycling Center, Campus Compost Program, HEB), user-generated artifact (30 students), participatory research (7), and field trip (1)
Key Takeaway
1. Recycling info is created at the RAs discretion, info is usually jam packed and not readable or eye-catching.
2. Most students don't utilize the campus recycling system because there is no instruction provided. They don’t know what plastic film is.
:: User-generated Artifact: to understand how the current recycling system is being used, we went to more than 30 dorm rooms and took pictures of their recycling bins. We took advantage of this opportunity to interact more with our end users.
:: Dorm Recycling Area: all signage are handmade by RAs.
:: Participatory Research: to understand the user’s understanding of plastic film recycling, their recycling habits, frustration, motivation, and goals + recruit users for more in-depth research and testing.
rEFRAME
Objective: identify the key challenges of plastic film recycling
Method: participatory interview, bundle/cluster findings
1. Recycling is a lifestyle and influenced by the community, but it takes individual effort. Recycling information is available but not accessible. 
2. Recycling info is created at the RAs discretion. RA is one of the direct influencers in our community.
3. Recycling projects on campus in the past couldn't sustain for two main reasons: viability & lack of resources, especially labor and finance.
4. Although plastic film recycling (single stream) is more straightforward than conventional plastic, it requires extra steps besides the residents' daily disposal routine, such as separating, cleaning, drying, and taking them back to the store.

:: Participatory interview :: the user works with the designer on their journey map.

:: User Flow :: Insights from the user helps the designer to identify friction points.

:: Information mapping :: The flow chart helps identify different challenges that take place in the user's decision-making process. It also reveals opportunity areas where design can facilitate changes.

iDEATE
We begin the ideation process by defining different design criteria to help us evaluate our ideas, and a list of Measure of Success for the next step — Prototype testing.
We narrowed challenge space with two How Can We (HCW) questions following this structure: HCW ___ [design task] ___ [user] to ___ [task] in order to ___ [design goal]? 

:: Idea Cluster :: Follow the Sprint design process and facilitate team members to collaborate virtually.

:: Idea Evaluation :: Using the design criteria to evaluate the 4 main design concepts from the previous step — Idea Cluster.

BUILD
Due to the timeline restraint, we decided to move forward with idea #3—Receptacle bin
We choose on 2 different materials (cardboard and fabric) that can be reused or recycled, and 3 designs to could elevate the user experience — making plastic film recycling fun.
Informational Strategy: educate, inspire, clear call for action through visual and content hierarchy.
TEST
We used two different protocols for the user test
A. User are give the prototype without any instruction 
— The designer observes and fill out the feedback sheet
— The designer ask follow up questions
B. User are give the prototype without any instruction 
— User explain the product for us
— The designer observe ask follow up questions
— The designer give the user 2 prototypes for A/B testing on features, materials, experiences.
feedback & ITERATION
FINAL DESIGN

— Recycling Labeling Sytem —

— Project One Pager —

You may also like

Back to Top